Thread:Haloprov/@comment-9026519-20140510064058/@comment-9026519-20140510073916

Okay. I think we should get back onto topic and I'm sure you agree.

Even though, yes my wording on those articles was inncorrect, they could have been changed so that they'd be correct in your view. Like I said earlier as well, the amount of edits that you've deleted someone elses work is equal to that where you have posted your own edits.

I'm going to quote you here but, "How 'bout when you understand the concept of an WIkia". Wikia is here so that the fans could make edits about that show as long as they're true facts that contribute to the article. As I see it, my information was correct and did add to the article, so I don't see how it's wrong. Maybe in your opinion it is, but, as proven by democracy, the majority wins.

The majority of anime wiki's do this, thus I did it following in their lead. I don't see how I did anything wrong, just that I made an edit following the majority and that it was unnecisarily deleted by a user who has just about as many deletes as he does contriubting edits. No user should have just as many deletes as they should their own contributing edit unless they're an admin or spam control (and ect.).

I don't know why you like to, but as long as the edit contributes it should stay. If an admin didn't want people editing the articles, then they should close the article down so that no one could edit it.